MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067125310 · doi:10.1109/wivec.2014.6953225

Frame-based mobility estimation via compressive sensing in delay-tolerant vehicular networks

2014· article· en· W2067125310 on OpenAlexaffabout
Waled Alasmary, Shahrokh Valaee, Samah El-Tantawy, Baher Abdulhai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMobility modelFrame (networking)Real-time computingScheme (mathematics)TRACE (psycholinguistics)TrajectoryComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the problem of estimating mobility trajectories via a small number of measurements from realistic mobility traces. We propose a frame-based solution to estimate the complete mobility trace at the end of the frame. During each frame, a few measurements are transmitted via vehicular communications, and then estimation is performed at the receiver. We propose different sampling schemes to estimate the mobility trajectory at the end of the frame, and we compare it to the actual mobility trace. The proposed scheme is designed as a practical system for vehicular mobility estimation, and is suitable for road traffic management applications. We study the proposed mobility estimation scheme via simulations with realistic mobility traces generated by Paramics simulator [1]. The data are based on a realistic map of the Gardinar Expressway in the city of Toronto. Extensive simulation results shows that the proposed scheme can significantly reduce the number of transmitted samples while providing a good estimate of the mobility traces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207