MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067129403 · doi:10.1117/12.628609

Photoluminescence quenching of colloidal silver nanoparticle on porous silicon

2005· article· en· W2067129403 on OpenAlexaff
Li‐Lin Tay, N. L. Rowell, Rabah Boukherroub

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceMaterials scienceNanoparticleQuenching (fluorescence)NanotechnologyBiosensorPorous siliconSiliconOptoelectronicsSemiconductorFluorescenceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoluminescent porous Si (pSi) is a potentially attractive material for biosensor devices. Its ease of fabrication, large active surface area and unique optical properties are just some important attributes. Among other transduction techniques, it is possible to monitor the onset of molecular binding events through the effective quenching of the bright pSi photoluminescence. Here we present the study of effective quenching through a colloidal Ag nanoparticle interaction with pSi. Placing the metallic nanoparticles in close proximity to the light emitting pSi can effectively sweep away the charge carriers from the semiconductor surface and result in a carrier depletion region near the Si-nanoparticle interface. By labeling the targeted bio-species with a silver nanoparticle, and the pSi surface with an appropriate receptor molecule ; in-situ PL monitoring can provide a real-time transduction scheme for the pSi- based biosensor devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207