NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF LASER-ASSISTED MACHINING OF INCONEL 718
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A numerical investigation of laser-assisted machining for Inconel 718 is presented. This study is based on a three-dimensional finite element model, which takes into account a new constitutive law of Inconel 718 as well as friction and heat transfer models at the tool-chip interface that are developed at the Aerospace Manufacturing Technology Centre (AMTC), of the National Research Council of Canada (NRC), Canada. The material flow stress is described as a function of the strain, the strain rate, and the temperature. The friction model accounts for the sticking and the sliding regions observed experimentally. The formulation of the heat transfer model is based on combining contact mechanics analysis with the solution of the thermal contact problem. The laser beam is modeled as a moving heat source, which is experimentally calibrated. To validate the three-dimensional finite element model, laser-assisted machining experiments were designed and carried out under different cutting conditions. The predicted cutting force and chip thickness are compared with the experimental results. The temperature, stress, strain, and strain rate fields in the primary deformation zone are investigated in order to reveal the plastic deformation process under laser-assisted machining operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".