MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067166101 · doi:10.1021/ac070221o

High-Throughput Cytochrome P450 Inhibition Assays Using Laser Diode Thermal Desorption-Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

2007· article· en· W2067166101 on OpenAlexaff
Jin Wu, Christopher S. Hughes, Pierre Picard, Sylvain Letarte, Mireille Gaudreault, Jean-François Lévesque, Deborah A. Nicoll‐Griffith, Kevin P. Bateman

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsPhytronix (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMass spectrometryAtmospheric-pressure chemical ionizationTandem mass spectrometryAmbient ionizationDesorption electrospray ionizationChemical ionizationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)TandemThermal desorptionAtmospheric pressureChromatographyLaserIonizationDesorptionEnvironmental chemistryOrganic chemistryAdsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the development of a high-throughput method for the analysis of cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibition assay incubation samples using laser diode thermal desorption interfaced with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry (LDTD-APCI-MS). Data for the CYP isoforms 3A4, 2D6, 2C9, and 1A2 from competitive inhibition assays are shown. The potential for inhibition of the CYP isoforms was measured by monitoring the level of the metabolites 6beta-hydroxytestosterone (3A4), dextrorphan (2D6), 4'-hydroxydiclofenac (2C9), and acetaminophen (1A2) formed in the presence of drug candidates using an eight-point titration. The analytical method involves plating of the inhibition samples on specially designed 96-well plates with stainless steel bottoms, followed by direct analysis using the LDTD source. Validation of the LDTD-MS method was performed by testing for interferences, reproducibility, dynamic range, ion suppression, and the ability of the source to produce comparable results to previously validated LC-MS methods. IC50 values for each CYP isoform using 33 different test compounds showed excellent agreement between LDTD-APCI-MS and LC-MS methods and literature values where available. Assay analysis time using the LDTD-APCI source is reduced to less than 30 min for a single 96-well plate compared to greater than 10 h using the LC-MS method. The LDTD-APCI-MS and LC-MS methods and results are compared and limitations and future potential for LDTD-APCI-MS are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207