Du providentialisme au néolibéralisme : de Marsh à Axworthy. Un nouveau discours de légitimation de la régulation sociale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article consiste en une analyse de trois documents dont l’influence, avérée ou pressentie, sur les modalités de la régulation sociale au Canada a été considérable : il s’agit des rapports Marsh (1943), Macdonald (1985) et Axworthy (1994). Les auteurs se penchent plus précisément sur les transformations significatives de la légitimation qu’implique le passage aux régulations sociales providentialiste (rapport Marsh) et, plus tard, néolibérale (rapports Macdonald et Axworthy). Nous tentons de montrer comment l’avènement d’une nouvelle logique de régulation sociale implique un déplacement significatif, dans le discours politique, de la représentation des rapports sociaux et de la relation de l’individu à la société.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.025 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".