MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067203347 · doi:10.1504/ijdmb.2008.016753

Gene Regulatory Network modelling: a state-space approach

2008· article· en· W2067203347 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data Mining and Bioinformatics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalian University of Technology
KeywordsPrincipal component analysisGene regulatory networkProbabilistic logicState variableComputer scienceBayesian networkState (computer science)State spaceControl (management)Bayesian information criterionExpression (computer science)Statistical modelState-space representationData miningGeneMathematicsArtificial intelligenceGene expressionBiologyStatisticsGeneticsAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposes a state-space model with control portion for inferring Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs). The proposed model views genes as the observation variables, whose expression values depend on the current internal state variables and control variables, and views the means of clusters of gene expression as the control variables of the internal state equation. Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis (PPCA) are used to estimate the internal states from observation data. The proposed approach is applied to two gene expression datasets. Computational results show that inferred GRNs possesses the characteristics of the real-life GRNs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it