Ultrastructural aspects of the development of the hyaline layer and extracellular matrix lining the gastrointestinal tract in embryos and larvae of the starfish <i>Pisaster ochraceus</i> preserved by freeze substitution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Embryos and larvae of the starfish Pisaster ochraceus are surrounded by a complex extracellular matrix (ECM) layer called the hyaline layer (HL). A similar but less well-organized ECM layer lines some regions of the larval gut. Examination of material preserved by freeze substitution shows that the HL consists of a coarse outer meshwork, a boundary layer, a supporting layer, which is divided into three sublayers, H1, H2, and H3, and an intervillus layer. The development of the HL has been studied in material preserved by freeze substitution. Development begins at fertilization when exocytosis of the cortical granules releases ECM into the perivitelline space and elevates the fertilization membrane. Shortly after, plaques of dense material with attached fibers are present on the outer surface of the egg plasmalemma. Following this, these plaques and fibers are associated with the tips of short microvilli, suggesting that they may induce microvillus formation. Next, the tips of some of the microvilli are joined by short regions of the H1 sublayer. Some of these H1 regions have short segments of boundary layer material associated with their outer surfaces while others are naked. Just prior to hatching, the H1 and boundary layers completely surround the embryo, separating the developing coarse meshwork and intervillus layers. Short segments of the H2 and H3 sublayers are also present. Posthatching, the microvilli and all HL layers increase in thickness and density, particularly the H2, boundary, and coarse outer meshwork layers. The results suggest a sequential organization of HL components from ECM that is secreted into the perivitelline space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".