MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067300224 · doi:10.1038/npre.2010.4425.1

Gas phase homolytic bond dissociation enthalpies of common laboratory solvents: A G4 theoretical study

2010· preprint· en· W2067300224 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Precedings · 2010
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
Canadian institutionsOkanagan College
FundersWestern Canada Research GridCompute Canada
KeywordsHomolysisBond-dissociation energyDissociation (chemistry)Gas phaseStandard enthalpy of formationChemistryThermodynamicsComputational chemistryPhysical chemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryRadicalPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gas phase standard state (298.15 K, 1 atm) calculations were conducted at the Gaussian-4 (G4) composite method level of theory to estimate the bond dissociation enthalpies (BDEs) of various common laboratory solvents. Excellent agreement was obtained between experimental and G4 estimated BDEs. The current study demonstrates the BDE prediction accuracy of the G4 method, and is also intended to function as a potentially useful resource in any reevaluations of the preferred BDEs for these common laboratory solvents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it