MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067301748 · doi:10.1029/2000gl012397

Extra‐tropical response to ENSO as expressed in an ice core from the Saint Elias Mountain Range

2001· article· en· W2067301748 on OpenAlexaffabout
G. W. K. Moore, G. Holdsworth, Keith Alverson

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeleconnectionClimatologyTropicsMultivariate ENSO indexGeologyEl Niño Southern OscillationAtmosphere (unit)SnowIce coreLa NiñaGeographyMeteorologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The El‐Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is the dominant mode of inter‐annual variability of the atmosphere‐ocean system in the tropical Pacific and exerts its influence in the extra‐tropics through persistent large‐scale wave‐like patterns in the atmosphere known as teleconnections. Although the physics of ENSO in the tropics is relatively well understood, our knowledge of its extra‐tropical response is based on teleconnection patterns that are statistical in origin and derived from relatively short time series. In this paper we analyze the ENSO signal in an annually resolved record of snow accumulation covering the period 1736–1985 from an ice core obtained in the Saint Elias Mountains of the Yukon. This region is located in the center of an area with one of the most significant teleconnection signatures associated with ENSO. The high elevation of the site where the ice core was obtained allows it to sample the mid and upper‐tropspheric flow where the extra‐tropical response to ENSO has its largest amplitude. As we show these characteristics of the site result in a significant ENSO signal in the snow accumulation time series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207