Percutaneous Transhepatic Pancreatic Islet Cell Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Radiologic Aspects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report our experience with percutaneous transhepatic pancreatic islet cell transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 1999 and May 2002, 34 patients underwent 68 islet cell transplantation procedures. Patients with C-peptide-negative type 1 diabetes were selected on the basis of poor metabolic control (hypoglycemia or lability) despite compliance with optimal medical therapy. Islet cells were isolated from brain-dead donors. Access to the portal vein was gained from a right percutaneous transhepatic approach, and islet cells were infused with intermittent pressure monitoring. Twenty patients underwent two transplantations, seven patients underwent three transplantations, and seven patients underwent one transplantation. Complications during and after the procedure and postprocedural diabetic status were monitored. RESULTS: Successful portal vein cannulation and islet cell infusion were achieved in all cases. Fluoroscopy was used as the primary guidance modality in 58 of 68 (85%) procedures, and ultrasonography was used in 10 of 68 (15%). Total recorded fluoroscopy time varied from 0.6 to 103 minutes, with a median of 6.9 minutes. Potentially serious complications occurred in six of 68 (9%) procedures. Two patients developed portal venous thrombosis, and with subsequent anticoagulation therapy, one of the two developed an expanding hepatic hematoma that required surgery. Clinically important hemorrhage occurred in four patients, three of whom required blood transfusions. Of 26 patients who received completed transplants, all became insulin independent, and 81% (21 of 26) remained insulin free at 1 year. CONCLUSION: The percutaneous transhepatic approach for the implantation of islet cells into the portal vein is a safe procedure, and together with use of current cell separation techniques and an immunosuppressive regimen, offers a marked advance in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".