MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067309688 · doi:10.1121/1.4778623

Relative timing of the three gestures of North American English /r/

2002· article· en· W2067309688 on OpenAlexaff
Bryan Gick, Louis Goldstein

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestureSyllableVariation (astronomy)TongueComputer scienceAmerican EnglishLinguisticsSpeech recognitionAcousticsArtificial intelligencePhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interarticulator timing of liquid consonants has been shown in recent years to be of importance in understanding syllable-based allophonic variation and related synchronic, historical, and developmental phonological phenomena. In this and other respects, the unusual complexity of North American English /r/ in particular has attracted much attention. Nevertheless, because of the difficulty of collecting simultaneous dynamic measurements of the lips, tongue body and tongue root, the articulatory dynamics of /r/ remain a subject of conjecture. A simultaneous ultrasound and video study of relative timing of these three gestures of /r/ will be presented. Preliminary results from three native North American English speakers show that, for the prevocalic allophone, the lip gesture reaches its target first, followed by the tongue body (TB) gesture, then the tongue root (TR) gesture last. As for the postvocalic allophone, the lip and TR constrictions are reduced in magnitude; also the TR gesture tends to precede the other gestures in both gestural onset and peak. These results support a view of the lip gesture of /r/ as a consonantal component, and presents a pattern for /r/ analogous to that previously observed for /l/. [Research supported by NSERC and NIH.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicPhonetics and Phonology ResearchFrench-language works237,207