MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067334647 · doi:10.1111/micc.12084

Shaping and Remodeling of the Fetoplacental Circulation: Aspects of Health and Disease

2013· editorial· en· W2067334647 on OpenAlexaff
Tara L. Haas

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocirculation · 2013
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlacental CirculationPreeclampsiaDiseaseGestational diabetesFetusAngiogenesisFetal circulationPlacentaPhysiologyFetal growthBiologyPathologicalMedicineNeurosciencePregnancyBioinformaticsPathologyInternal medicineGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extensive vascular adaptations occur during pregnancy, and these result in the formation of a low-resistance placental circulation that maintains high blood flow to the developing fetus. These adaptations encompass both functional and structural alterations, including altered vasoreactivity of resistance vessels, arterial remodeling and angiogenesis. This Special Topics issue presents a collection of expert reviews that summarize the current state of knowledge on the regulation of the structural and functional changes that occur within the fetoplacental circulation, as well as introduce emerging research questions and tools. Emphasis is placed on defining the mechanisms that underlie these physiological adaptations, as a foundation for applying this knowledge to the development of improved early detection markers and treatments for pathological conditions such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, and fetal growth restriction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocirculationSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207