MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067361378 · doi:10.1055/s-2004-831864

Mechanismen der Transplantatvaskulopathie

2004· review· de· W2067361378 on OpenAlexaff
Helen Baron, G. Plenz, Min Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueDMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift · 2004
Typereview
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeointimaCell biologyImmune systemMonocyteCytokineImmunologyVascular smooth muscleBiologyEndotheliumChemistryMedicineSmooth muscleInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is a diffuse, obliterative form of arteriosclerosis that is characterized by the production of a neointima rich in vascular smooth muscle cells that progressively obstructs the lumen. Pathophysiologically, after heart transplantation, alloantigens (e. g. on donor endothelial cells) are presented by antigen presenting cells to the T-cells of the body's immune system. With the appropriate costimulatory signal, this signal pattern generates a differentiated T-cell, B-cell, and inflammatory cell response whereas without the second signal, the immune cells undergo apoptosis. In case of immune cell proliferation and differentiation, a coordinated pattern of cytokine release is initiated. Cells of innate immunity, monocyte-derived macrophages, are involved in this process. The inflammatory response culminates in rolling, sticking, and diapedesis through the coronary vascular endothelium and migration and phenotype switch of medial smooth muscle cells mediated by generation of growth-promoting cytokines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.059

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDMW - Deutsche Medizinische WochenschriftSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207