MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067374230 · doi:10.1037/h0087152

Peur du mouvement chez des accidentés du travail: L'Échelle de Kinésiophobie de Tampa (EKT).

2002· article· fr· W2067374230 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsWorkplace Safety & Insurance Board
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La presente etude a pour but d'evaluer certaines qualites psychometriques de la version canadienne-francaise de l'echelle de Kinesiophobie de Tampa - le EKT-CF (en anglais, le Tampa Scale ofKinesiophobia). Un echantillon de 70 sujets canadiens-francais (15 femmes et 55 hommes) souffrant de differentes blessures chroniques survenues au travail ont rempli l'EKT-CF ainsi que des mesures d'incapacite, de la douleur, de depression et d'anxiete. Les resultats montrent que l'EKT-CF possede un degre de coherence interne acceptable. De plus, une peur croissante du mouvement a ete associee a un niveau plus eleve d'incapacite due a la douleur, une intensite de la douleur plus severe, une plus grande detresse psychologique et un niveau plus faible d'autocontrole. Les scores de l'EKT-CF ont aussi ete inversement associes a la capacite de retour au travail a la suite de la readaptation professionnelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.013
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it