Peur du mouvement chez des accidentés du travail: L'Échelle de Kinésiophobie de Tampa (EKT).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La presente etude a pour but d'evaluer certaines qualites psychometriques de la version canadienne-francaise de l'echelle de Kinesiophobie de Tampa - le EKT-CF (en anglais, le Tampa Scale ofKinesiophobia). Un echantillon de 70 sujets canadiens-francais (15 femmes et 55 hommes) souffrant de differentes blessures chroniques survenues au travail ont rempli l'EKT-CF ainsi que des mesures d'incapacite, de la douleur, de depression et d'anxiete. Les resultats montrent que l'EKT-CF possede un degre de coherence interne acceptable. De plus, une peur croissante du mouvement a ete associee a un niveau plus eleve d'incapacite due a la douleur, une intensite de la douleur plus severe, une plus grande detresse psychologique et un niveau plus faible d'autocontrole. Les scores de l'EKT-CF ont aussi ete inversement associes a la capacite de retour au travail a la suite de la readaptation professionnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".