A reconstruction of Moorhead and Emerson Phase environments along the eastern margin of glacial Lake Agassiz, Rainy River basin, northwestern Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mapping of Quaternary geology in the Rainy River lowland, northwestern Ontario resulted in discovery of several fossil-bearing localities. Organic remains are associated with both the Moorhead and Emerson phases of glacial Lake Agassiz. Wood samples recovered from Moorhead Phase deposits have radiocarbon ages ranging between 10.8 and 9.9 ka BP. The wood is detrital and cannot be used to date the beginning of the low-water phase. Nearshore, deltaic, alluvial, peatland, open-water wetland, and upland soil environments are represented in the Moorhead Phase sediment records. Emerson Phase transgressive deposits overlie Moorhead Phase sediments and erosional surfaces. Wood samples recovered from flotsam layers in Emerson Phase nearshore deposits have yielded radiocarbon ages ranging between 10.5 and 9.5 ka BP. Stratigraphic and sedimentologic evidence suggests that the transgression began approximately 9.9 ka BP. Pollen, plant macrofossil, insect, and mollusc assemblages have been affected by long-distance transport, sorting, and reworking by fluvial and nearshore processes. They represent a wide spectrum of terrestrial and aquatic habitats indiscriminantly brought together during high-water periods. The Moorhead and Emerson phase assemblages indicate conditions similar to those in the region today, but there is a distinct component whose modern range is much farther north and west of the study region. In this respect, the assemblages are similar to the mixed communities described from other late-glacial sites of the mid-continent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".