MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067377491 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.125314

Intraband versus interband decoherence times in biased semiconductor superlattices

2004· article· en· W2067377491 on OpenAlexafffund
Aizhen Zhang, Marc M. Dignam

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQuantum decoherencePhysicsCondensed matter physicsPhononExcitonExtrapolationCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)SuperlatticeSemiconductorScatteringQuantum mechanicsQuantum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a theoretical method of calculating the dynamics of excitons in biased semiconductor superlattices, including exciton-LO-phonon interactions. We use this method to determine phonon-induced excitonic decoherence in the interband and intraband polarizations. We find that the intraband decoherence time is much longer than one would expect from a simple extrapolation from the interband decoherence time. The longer decoherence time is shown to be due to the persistence of intraband coherence after exciton-phonon scattering events. The results are found to be in qualitative agreement with recent experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.900

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207