Sursassite: Hydrogen bonding, cation order, and pumpellyite intergrowth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystal chemistry of sursassite, simplified formula Mn 2+ 2 Al 3 Si 3 O 11 (OH) 3 , from six different localities [(1) Falotta, Switzerland, (2) Woodstock, New Brunswick, Canada, (3) Kamisugai, Japan, (4) Kamogawa, Japan, (5) Molinello, Italy, and (6) Gambatesa, Italy] was studied using electron microprobe analysis (EMPA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods. The structure has two symmetry independent Mn sites. The Mn1 site is seven coordinated by O and hosts, in addition to Mn 2+ , up to 20% Ca, whereas Mn2 has octahedral coordination and is strongly selective for Mn 2+ . In the simplified formula, three smaller octahedral M sites are occupied by Al. However, M1 also accepts significant amounts of divalent cations, such as Cu, Mg, Fe, and Mn, whereas M2 is occupied exclusively by Al. The unit-cell parameters of sursassite are a = 8.698-8.728, b = 5.789-5.807, c = 9.778-9.812 Å, β = 108.879-109.060°, V = 465.7-470.0 Å 3 , the space group is P2 1 /m. Structure refinements converged to R1 values of 2.15-6.62%. In agreement with bond-valence analyses, at least three OH groups, depending on the concentration of divalent cations at M1, are found at the O6, O7, and O11 positions. However, the bond-valence sum at O10 is always low, thus partial hydroxylation is assumed at O10 to maintain charge balance. Owing to the influence of divalent cations at M1 in sursassite the hydrogen-bond systems in sursassite and isostructural macfallite are different. The FTIR spectrum in the region of OH-stretching vibrations is characterized by three strong bands at 3511, 3262, and around 2950 cm -1 , the latter being broad. The band at 2950 cm -1 is assigned to strong hydrogen bonds between O6 and O10 (O6···O10 = 2.66 Å). Residual difference-Fourier peaks in the refinement of the Kamogawa and Molinello (specimen 1) crystals indicated less than 5% pumpellyite intergrowth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".