MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067403510 · doi:10.1364/oe.16.009306

Theory of dielectric micro-sphere dynamics in a dual-beam optical trap

2008· article· en· W2067403510 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Kawano, J. T. Blakely, Reuven Gordon, David Sinton

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOptical tweezersMultipole expansionPhysicsOpticsOscillation (cell signaling)Optical forceBeam (structure)Maxwell stress tensorDielectricTrappingMie scatteringComputational physicsClassical mechanicsCauchy stress tensorQuantum mechanicsLight scattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the dynamics of an array of polystyrene micron-sized spheres in a dual-beam fiber-optic trap. Experimental results show non-uniform equilibrium particle spacing and spontaneous self-sustained oscillation for large particle numbers. Results are analyzed with a Maxwell- Stress Tensor method using the Generalized Multipole Technique, where hydrodynamic interactions between particles are included. The theoretical analysis matches well with the experimentally observed equilibrium particle spacing. The theory shows that an offset in the trapping beams is the underlying mechanism for the oscillations and influences both the oscillation frequency and the damping rate for oscillations. The theory presented is of general interest to other systems involving multi-particle optical interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsFrench-language works237,207