Souveraineté dans les colonies, souveraineté en métropole : le rôle de la Nouvelle-France dans la consolidation de l’autorité maritime en France, 1620-1628
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article traite du rôle que jouait la Nouvelle-France dans la consolidation de l’autorité maritime en France, d’abord sous l’Amirauté puis sous la Couronne, au début du XVIIe siècle. L’incorporation de la colonie dans ces juridictions montre que les activités outre-mer faisaient partie des calculs dynastique et politique des titulaires de la même façon que leurs offices et commissions le faisaient en France. Ces activités en Nouvelle-France étaient susceptibles des rivalités personnelles et institutionnelles. L’extension de la juridiction amirale, dedans et hors de France, encouragée par le roi, met en relief les relations intimes entre la formation de l’État et la construction de la souveraineté coloniale dans l’Atlantique français.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".