MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE INHIBITION AUGMENTS THE SYMPATHETIC NEURAL RESPONSE TO POSTURAL STRESS

2001· article· en· W2067432479 on OpenAlexaff
J. Kevin Shoemaker, Cynthia S. Hogeman, Mazhar H. Khan, J. Daley, Lawrence I. Sinoway

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyridostigminePlaceboAnesthesiaMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity characteristics of burst frequency, mean burst amplitude and total amplitude were assessed during graded head-up tilt (HUT) (5 min each at 0, 20, 40 and 60°) before and 60 min following either an oral dose of pyridostigmine (60 mg; n = 9) or placebo (n = 5). No drug side effects were noticed. Burst frequency and total amplitude increased during HUT for both groups in both conditions. For the placebo group the increases in burst frequency, mean burst amplitude and total amplitude were not different in the repeated trials. However, following pyridostigmine burst frequency was elevated at rest (P < 0.05) and this elevation was sustained during HUT (main effect; P < 0.003). Similarly, mean burst amplitude (P < 0.004) and total amplitude (P < 0.0001) were elevated following pyridostigmine (main effects of drug). No differences in the neural response to a cold pressor test were observed following the drug or placebo treatment. It was concluded that pyridostigmine treatment, at doses that do not produce cholinergic side effects, augmented the sympathetic postganglionic nerve response to orthostatic stress. (Supported by CSA, NSERC, NAG 9-1844 from NASA, R01 AG12227 and M01 RR10732 from NIH).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207