MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067435361 · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.143

Generation of Block Diagonal forms Using Hierarchical Clustering for Cell Formation Problems

2014· article· en· W2067435361 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia CIRP · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiagonalBlock (permutation group theory)Hierarchical clusteringCluster analysisMathematicsComputer scienceAlgorithmCombinatoricsArtificial intelligenceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While cell formation (CF) problems have been studied for few decades, the purpose of this paper is to advance the solution technique using one classical approach, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA). In the application of HCA, one technical challenge is to cluster both machines and parts simultaneously. In this paper, this challenge is addressed by quantifying the coupling between machines and parts in the clustering process. One feature of the proposed method is to generate block diagonal forms that show some intermediate sorting of machines and parts without specifying the structural criteria (e.g., the number of cells). Consequently, engineers can specify the structural criteria after inspecting the block diagonal forms instead of specifying them at the beginning. Some numerical examples from literature are used to examine and verify the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it