La transmission du patrimoine dans les terroirs en expansion : un exemple canadien au XVIIIe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article retrace le processus de transmission du patrimoine dans une seigneurie canadienne au XVIIIe siècle. Il insiste sur la nécessité de tenir compte de la nature des biens transmis pour comprendre les formes et cerner les effets de ce processus. Cette approche permet de constater que la donation qui se généralise vers le milieu du XVIIIe siècle n’implique pas nécessairement l’inégalité entre les enfants. De plus, elle indique que ce recours à la donation est davantage lié à l’accroissement de la capacité productive des exploitations qu’à la saturation du terroir. Par ailleurs, l’étude démontre que la présence de terres disponibles ne garantit pas l’efficacité du système de reproduction sociale et que ce système, quoique relativement égalitaire, permet le maintien des écarts économiques entre les générations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".