Medical Management of Ulcerative Colitis with a Specific Focus on 5-Aminosalicylates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Medical management of ulcerative colitis has continued to evolve over more than half of a century. Perhaps, the important advance was the development of sulfasalazine, a drug initially used for the treatment of inflammatory joint disease and only later in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Sulfasalazine was a combination designer drug consisting of sulfapyridine, a sulfa-containing antibacterial agent, and 5-amino-salicylate (5-ASA), an anti-inflammatory agent. Its value appeared to be its ability to target a therapeutic concentration of the 5-ASA component of the medication primarily in the colon, largely avoiding proximal small intestinal absorption. With increasing experience, however, it also became evident that many patients treated with sulfasalazine developed intolerance to the drug and, in some rare instances, serious drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions, largely to the sulfapyridine portion. As a result, a number of alternative forms of delivery of 5-ASA were developed consisting of either a similar sulfasalazine-like prodrug formulation requiring luminal destruction of an azo-bond releasing the 5-ASA or a pH-dependent 5-ASA packaging system that permitted release in the distal intestine, particularly in the colon. As a result, 5-ASA-containing medications continue to provide a valuable management tool for remission induction in mildly to moderately active distal or extensive ulcerative colitis, an additional option for more severely symptomatic disease and value for maintenance therapy with limited potential side effects, even with long-term use.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".