MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067456806 · doi:10.1002/ajh.1062

Thalidomide‐associated hepatitis: A case report

2001· article· en· W2067456806 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Fowler, Kevin Imrie

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Hematology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThalidomideMedicinePlasmacytosisMultiple myelomaPomalidomideHepatitisAplastic anemiaImmunologyInternal medicineGastroenterologyDermatologyBone marrow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a case of hepatitis in a 58-year-old woman being treated with thalidomide for end-stage plasma cell leukemia. The patient had a medical history including chronic stable hepatitis C infection. At diagnosis there was a severe anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypercalcemia, IgG paraproteinemia, peripheral blood myeloma cells, and a marrow plasmacytosis with lytic bony lesion. The disease was refractory to standard chemotherapy, and she was treated with oral thalidomide. Within 1 week she became jaundiced and developed a marked transaminitis. This promptly resolved upon cessation of thalidomide alone. Thalidomide has recently enjoyed renewed interest as a treatment in many disorders, including plasma cell leukemia. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of thalidomide-associated hepatotoxicity. Although the mechanism of its actions on the liver are uncertain, it is possible that thalidomide acts as a direct hepatotoxin or as an immuno-modulator, altering the activity of chronic viral hepatitis. We present this case to increase awareness of a new potential side effect of thalidomide as its clinical indications expand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of HematologySame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207