MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067522593 · doi:10.1002/glia.20388

Calcium signaling in Schwann cells at synaptic and extra‐synaptic sites: Active glial modulation of neuronal activity

2006· review· en· W2067522593 on OpenAlexafffund
Isabelle Rousse, Richard Robitaille

Bibliographic record

VenueGlia · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNeuroscienceBiologyNeurotransmissionPostsynaptic potentialSynaptic plasticityNeuromuscular junctionSynaptic fatigueSchwann cellNervous systemNeurogliaInhibitory postsynaptic potentialCentral nervous systemCell biologyExcitatory postsynaptic potentialReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glial cells are widely dispersed in the central nervous system (CNS) as well as in the peripheral nervous system (PNS). In the PNS, perisynaptic Schwann cells (PSCs) are the glial cells associated with the pre- and postsynaptic elements of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). They, as other glial cells of the CNS, respond to high-frequency motor nerve stimulation with an increase in intracellular Ca(2+). In addition to detecting and responding to neurotransmission, PSCs are involved in short-term plasticity events where they depress neurotransmission through G-protein-dependent mechanisms and potentiate synaptic activity via Ca(2+)-dependent mechanisms. In this review, we will discuss evidence that outlines the role of PSCs in short- and long-term modulation of synaptic activity. We will also emphasize present functional similarities and differences in PSC activation at different NMJs. The importance of glial-neural interactions along myelinating axons will also be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGliaSame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207