MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067543491 · doi:10.1136/bcr.09.2011.4807

Obsessive compulsive disorder with psychosis NOS, in an asexual male: a diagnostic challenge

2011· article· en· W2067543491 on OpenAlexaff
T. Smigas, J. Nevue, Amin Muhammad Gadit

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Case Reports · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychiatryDelusionPerfectionism (psychology)PersecutionBody dysmorphic disorderMedicineDelusional disorderOlanzapinePsychosisPsychologyPsychoanalysisParanoiaParanoid schizophreniaPsychotherapistSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Social psychologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 28-year-old asexual Malaysian male presented for emergency assessment with suicidal thoughts, paranoid delusions and increasing time spent on ritualistic behaviours that included hand washing, door checking and religious chanting. His obsessions were primarily related to counting, perfectionism, contamination and chanting. The patient found himself compelled to complete numerous rituals including chanting religiously to 1000, having to restart in the event of an error during such and also described delusions of being followed by a woman who was analysing his life pattern in order to steal from him. He then started to proclaim himself to be Buddha as he believed this would keep his dead grandmother away from him, thus avoiding supposed persecution from her. Following optimisation of both escitalpram and olanzapine, a slight reduction in the patient's ritualistic behaviour and psychotic phenomenon were witnessed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Case ReportsSame topicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFrench-language works237,207