Bloqueo interauricular como sustrato anatómico-eléctrico de arritmias supraventriculares: síndrome de Bayés
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article we aimed to establish that interatrial block exists as an anatomical-electrical entity, which should be considered a true block. Interatrial block presents with different degrees as other blocks in the conduction system. It shows a correlation with the left atrium size, however, it can be seen in patients with normal atrial size too. Interatrial block is strongly associated with atrial arrhythmias and it could be considered a predictor of cardioembolic stroke. Interatrial block is an expression of atrial electrical remodeling and dysfunction. IAB can be transient and in certain clinical circumstances, may be reversible. The contribution of endocardial mapping has increased our knowledge of the anatomy and pathophysiology of interatrial block. Magnetocardiography could be a possible non-invasive procedure to further investigate this entity. The interatrial block classification should include first, second and third degree or alternatively, in order to simplify the terminology: partial or advanced. The P wave morphology should always be taking into consideration when diagnosing this condition. Finally, without the initial description of interatrial block made by Dr. Bayés de Luna, it would be impossible to understand interatrial block as an anatomical and electrical substrate for atrial arrhythmias. It is our opinion that this represents a major contribution to the knowledge of electrocardiography and electrophysiology, and makes commendable that this arrhythmic syndrome should be called «Bayés' syndrome»
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it