MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067563839 · doi:10.1143/jjap.41.4965

Structural and Electronic Properties of Barium Silicide on Si(100)

2002· article· en· W2067563839 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kaoru Ojima, Masamichi Yoshimura, Kazuyuki Ueda

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSurface and Thin Film Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsSilicideBariumX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyUltraviolet photoelectron spectroscopyScanning tunneling microscopeMaterials scienceSpectroscopyAnnealing (glass)Fermi levelScanning tunneling spectroscopyDensity of statesAnalytical Chemistry (journal)SiliconCondensed matter physicsChemistryNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsNuclear magnetic resonanceMetallurgyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Barium silicides formed on the Si(100) surface have been investigated by scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy (STM/STS). The structure of the silicide surface depends on the preparation procedure; three kinds of silicide phases coexist on the surface when 2 monolayers (MLs) of Ba are deposited on Si(100) at the specimen temperature of 850 K, while two of the three phases appear when 2 MLs of Ba are deposited on Si(100) at room temperature, followed by annealing at 850 K. The STS result indicates that all the phases show semiconducting behavior with a band gap of ∼ 1.3 eV and that one of the three phases has local density of states (LDOS) at 2.5 eV below the Fermi energy, which coincides with the reported results of metastable de-excitation spectroscopy (MDS) and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Applied PhysicsSame topicSurface and Thin Film PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207