STOCHASTIC RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN MULTIAGENT ENVIRONMENTS: AN APPROACH BASED ON DISTRIBUTED Q-VALUES AND BOUNDED REAL-TIME DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper contributes to solve effectively stochastic resource allocation problems in multiagent environments. To address it, a distributed Q-values approach is proposed when the resources are distributed among agents a priori, but the actions made by an agent may influence the reward obtained by at least another agent. This distributed Q-values approach allows to coordinate agents' reward and thus permits to reduce the set of states and actions to consider. On the other hand, when the resources are available to all agents, no distributed Q-values is possible and tight lower and upper bounds are proposed for existing heuristic search algorithms. Our experimental results demonstrate the efficiency of our distributed Q-values in terms of planning time as well as our tight bounds in terms of fast convergence and reduction of backups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it