MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Chronic treatment with lithium, but not sodium valproate, increases cortical N-acetyl-aspartate concentrations in euthymic bipolar patients

2003· article· en· W2067569855 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Clinical Psychopharmacology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBipolar Disorder and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
KeywordsLithium (medication)Bipolar disorderSodiumCreatineMood stabilizerInternal medicineChemistryEndocrinologyValproic AcidPsychologyMedicineEpilepsyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies have found that treatment with lithium over a 4-week period may increase the concentration of N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA) in both bipolar patients and controls. In view of other findings indicating that NAA concentrations may be a good marker for neuronal viability and/or functioning, it has been further suggested that some of the long term benefits of lithium may therefore be due to actions to improve these neuronal properties. The aim of the present study was to utilize H magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( H MRS) to further examine the effects of both lithium and sodium valproate upon NAA concentrations in treated euthymic bipolar patients. In the first part of the study, healthy controls (n =18) were compared with euthymic bipolar patients (type I and type II) who were taking either lithium (n =14) or sodium valproate (n =11), and NAA : creatine ratios were determined. In the second part, we examined a separate group of euthymic bipolar disorder patients taking sodium valproate (n =9) and compared these to age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n =11), and we quantified the exact concentrations of NAA using an external solution. The results from the first part of the study showed that bipolar patients chronically treated with lithium had a significant increase in NAA concentrations but, in contrast, there were no significant increases in the sodium valproate-treated patients compared to controls. The second part of the study also found no effects of sodium valproate on NAA concentrations. These findings are the first to compare NAA concentrations in euthymic bipolar patients being treated with lithium or sodium valproate. The results support suggestions that longer-term administration of lithium to bipolar patients may increase NAA concentrations. However, the study suggests that chronic administration of sodium valproate to patients does not lead to similar changes in NAA concentrations. These findings suggest that sodium valproate and lithium may not share a common mechanism of action in bipolar disorder involving neurotrophic or neuroprotective effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it