MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067612011 · doi:10.1121/1.2932990

Reverberation inversion for seabed properties

2008· article· en· W2067612011 on OpenAlexaff
Stan E. Dosso, Peter L. Nielsen, C. H. Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReverberationSeabedGeologyCovarianceA priori and a posterioriInversion (geology)AcousticsSonarScatteringMathematicsStatisticsSeismologyPhysicsOpticsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper applies nonlinear inversion to reverberation and/or propagation data recorded on a towed horizontal array for geoacoustic and scattering properties of the seabed. A Bayesian inversion approach is applied to estimate properties of the posterior probability density, such as the maximum a posteriori (most-probable) model, 1-D and 2-D marginal probability distributions, and covariance/correlation matrices, providing optimal parameter estimates and quantifying parameter uncertainties and inter-relationships. Of particular interest is quantifying the information content of different combinations of data (e.g., reverberation or propagation data; joint inversion of reverberation and propagation data) to resolve seabed parameters, and understanding strong parameter inter-relationships (correlations) which, in some cases, act as the limiting factor in resolving geoacoustic/scattering parameters. The inversion is also applied to shallow-water reverberation and propagation data recorded in Mediterranean Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207