MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067623889 · doi:10.1007/s10237-014-0590-8

Extension of Murray’s law including nonlinear mechanics of a composite artery wall

2014· article· en· W2067623889 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan B. Lindström, Ganarupan Satha, Anders Klarbring

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Material Modeling
Canadian institutionsEngineering Link (Canada)
FundersVetenskapsrådet
KeywordsNonlinear systemMechanicsParametric statisticsWork (physics)Constraint (computer-aided design)MathematicsMaterials scienceClassical mechanicsStructural engineeringPhysicsMechanical engineeringEngineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A goal function approach is used to derive an extension of Murray's law that includes effects of nonlinear mechanics of the artery wall. The artery is modeled as a thin-walled tube composed of different species of nonlinear elastic materials that deform together. These materials grow and remodel in a process that is governed by a target state defined by a homeostatic radius and a homeostatic material composition. Following Murray's original idea, this target state is defined by a principle of minimum work. We take this work to include that of pumping and maintaining blood, as well as maintaining the materials of the artery wall. The minimization is performed under a constraint imposed by mechanical equilibrium. We derive a condition for the existence of a cost-optimal homeostatic state. We also conduct parametric studies using this novel theoretical frame to investigate how the cost-optimal radius and composition of the artery wall depend on flow rate, blood pressure, and elastin content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomechanics and Modeling in MechanobiologySame topicElasticity and Material ModelingFrench-language works237,207