MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067626964 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.085901

Solute Diffusion in Metals: Larger Atoms Can Move Faster

2004· article· en· W2067626964 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor materials and interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiffusionVacancy defectChemical physicsNickelMaterials scienceElectronTransition metalMetalAtomic physicsThermodynamicsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First-principles calculations for the diffusion of transition metal solutes in nickel challenge the commonly accepted description of solute diffusion rates in metals. The traditional view is that larger atoms move slower than smaller atoms. Our calculation shows the opposite: larger atoms, in fact, can move much faster than smaller atoms. Conventional mechanisms involving the effect of misfit strain or the solute-vacancy binding interactions cannot explain this counterintuitive diffusion trend. Instead, the origin of this behavior stems from the bonding characteristics of the d electrons of solute atoms, suggesting that a similar diffusion trend also occurs in other types of host lattices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it