A Brief Computational Study of Decamethyldizincocene Formation via Diethylzinc and Decamethylzincocene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have used density functional theory and ab initio methods to study different mechanistic possibilities for the formation of decamethyldizincocene from the reaction between decamethylzincocene and diethylzinc. Our results suggest that decamethyldizincocene could form from the combination of two pentamethylcyclopentadienylzinc radicals. More importantly, our data show that homolytic dissociation of decamethylzincocene into pentamethylcyclopentadienylzinc and pentamethylcyclopentadienyl radicals is 6.7 kcal/mol less costly than the analogous dissociation of zincocene. If such an energy difference is coupled with the fact that the activation barrier to form the half-sandwich product pentamethylcyclopentadienylethylzinc is 11.8 kcal/mol more costly than to form cyclopentadienylethylzinc, we can rationalize why dizincocene does not form experimentally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".