Construction of aFrancisella tularensis two-dimensional electrophoresis protein database
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have started the construction of a two-dimensional database of the proteome of Francisella tularensis, a bacterium that is responsible for the highly pathogenic disease tularemia. The genome of this intracellular pathogen is not completely sequenced yet and, currently, information about only 66 proteins is available from NCBI database. We have analyzed the F. tularensis live vaccine strain by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis with immobilized pH 3-10 gradient in the first dimension and 9-16% gradient or tricine SDS-PAGE in the second dimension. In both cases about 2000 spots were detected. Furthermore, we compared the protein pattern of the nonvirulent F. tularensis live vaccine strain with protein profiles of two wild type clinical isolates and more than 50 differentially expressed proteins were counted. The separated proteins are going to be identified by peptide mass fingerprinting. However, due to the lack of complete genome sequence data only eight proteins were unambiguously identified. Among them, acid phosphatase and the most basic isoform of a hypothetical 23 kDa protein are characteristic only for virulent strains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".