MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067673535 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2012.2197424

Constrained Potential Function—Based Control of Microgrids for Improved Dynamic Performance

2012· article· en· W2067673535 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsOntario Power GenerationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridSmart gridContext (archaeology)Controller (irrigation)Computer scienceControl engineeringDistributed generationGridFunction (biology)Set (abstract data type)Energy managementDistributed computingControl theory (sociology)EngineeringControl (management)Energy (signal processing)Renewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of the smart grid, this paper focuses on control and management strategies for integration of distributed energy resources in the power system. This work conceptualizes a hierarchical framework for the control of microgrids-the building blocks of the smart grid-and develops the notion of potential functions for the secondary controller for devising intermediate set points to ensure feasibility of operation. A potential function is defined for each controllable unit of the microgrid such that minimizing the potential function corresponds to achieving the control goal. The set points are dynamically updated using communication within the microgrid. This strategy is generalized to include both local and system-wide constraints. Case studies are presented that show effectiveness of the proposed approach in stabilizing a microgrid in response to disturbances such as load change, line outage, and generator malfunctioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it