Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude est consacrée à l'examen de la construction d'une aire autonome de production et de transmisson du savoir historique au Canada français entre 1920 et 1950. Le faible développement des études historiques dans le système universitaire durant la période de l'entre-deux-guerres est en partie compensé par la multiplication, au même moment, des sociétés savantes qui s'affirment alors comme le lieu d'élaboration privilégié de l'historiographie canadienne-française. Ce milieu savant contribue à la mise en place graduelle d'un espace d'encadrement, de réunion, de production et de reconnaissance spécifique à l'histoire. Les fondations en 1947 des instituts d'histoire des universités Laval et de Montréal, de l'Institut d'histoire de l'Amérique française et de la Revue d'histoire de l'Amérique française se situent dans la continuité de ce mouvement, tout en posant les conditions institutionnelles propres à favoriser une prise de distance face aux différentes injonctions externes (doctrinales, idéologiques, politiques) qui structurent alors la quête de la vérité et l'étude du passé.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".