MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Computer as a Tool for Teaching Grammar: The Program<i>Grampol—Gramatyka Polsha</i>

2004· article· en· W2067692958 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jolanta Tambor

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLanguage and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrammarComputer scienceSpellingLinguisticsInflectionGRASPSyntaxNatural language processingProgramming languageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a detailed description of the computer program Grampol ver. 3.0 for Windows, which was designed as an aid in teaching Polish to adult students, as well as non-native speakers of Polish who wish to grasp the rules of grammar. The program covers the areas of phonetics, spelling, word formation, inflection and syntax. The program’s lessons are the most important aspect of Grampol. They address the peculiarities of Polish and its most difficult grammar rules, providing students with an effective tool for analysis and synthesis of oral and/or written texts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1060.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicLanguage and CultureFrench-language works237,207