MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067710962 · doi:10.1039/b109391f

Oscillatory clusters in a reaction–diffusion system switching between excitable and unexcitable states

2002· article· en· W2067710962 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerturbation (astronomy)Reaction–diffusion systemPhysicsForcing (mathematics)MechanicsChemistryThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we report the observation of oscillatory clusters in the photosensitive Belousov–Zhabotinsky reaction switching between excitable and unexcitable states. Numerical studies with a three-variable Oregonator model have been carried out in one- and two-dimensional media. Both non-flux and periodic boundaries have been characterized. Two- and three-phase clusters with standing, breathing, and irregular segregations are achieved when the intensity and durations of the two phases of the square-wave forcing are varied. The occurrence of oscillatory clusters in the excitable medium is due to the dual functions of the inhibitory light perturbation, i.e. eliminating existing wave activity as observed in earlier studies and initiating pattern formation at unexcited regions. The unusual positive impact of the inhibitory perturbation is analyzed, based on the flow trajectories of the system in a two-dimensional concentration phase plane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it