MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067775549 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.68.094507

Doping dependence of the upper critical field of electron-doped<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pr</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mi>−</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ce</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CuO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>thin films

2003· article· lv· W2067775549 on OpenAlexaff
P. Fournier, R. L. Greene

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2003
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsElectrical resistivity and conductivitySuperconductivityDopingCritical fieldCuprateField (mathematics)Quantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using resistivity measurements as a function of applied magnetic field down to 38 mK, we evaluate the temperature dependence of the c-axis upper critical field ${(H}_{c2,\ensuremath{\rho}})$ for electron-doped ${\mathrm{Pr}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Ce}}_{x}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ thin films. We compare its temperature dependence to the irreversibility line as determined by ac susceptibility $[{H}_{\mathrm{IL}}(T)]$ between 2 K and the transition temperature. For all Ce contents, ${H}_{c2,\ensuremath{\rho}}(T)$ presents an upward curvature, with no sign of the expected conventional saturation at low temperature, even down to 38 mK. The onset of resistivity follows closely the irreversibility line, and the general trend in temperature for ${H}_{c2,\ensuremath{\rho}}(T)$ is rather insensitive to the criterion used for its determination. Only a rough criterion corresponding to a full recovery of the normal-state resistivity for $x=0.15$ is bringing the characteristic field temperature dependence close to the expected description by Werthamer, Helfand and Hohenberg. Doping affects mainly the zero-temperature value of ${H}_{c2,\ensuremath{\rho}}$ and ${H}_{\mathrm{IL}}$ which are scaling with the critical temperature, but not the superconducting gap. The temperature dependence is very similar to that observed with the hole-doped cuprates, and underlines a similar physical origin related to the properties in the vortex-liquid phase and contributions of superconducting fluctuations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207