MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067781441 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.140104

Consecutive Peierls distortions and high-pressure phase transitions in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>YH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2010· article· lv· W2067781441 on OpenAlexaff
Yansun Yao, D. D. Klug

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2010
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase (matter)Crystal structureMaterials scienceCrystallographyThermodynamicsPhase transitionPhysicsTransformation (genetics)Series (stratigraphy)EnthalpyAlgorithmComputer scienceChemistryQuantum mechanicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-pressure phase transformations in ${\text{YH}}_{3}$ were investigated using the evolutionary algorithm for structural searches. A series of phase transformations are predicted with three lowest enthalpy phases identified. Two consecutive Peierls distortions within the hcp and fcc cells result into two low-pressure structures, the previously identified $P\overline{3}c1$ structure and a predicted $C2/m$ structure. The $P\overline{3}c1$ structure transforms to a $C2/m$ structure at 12 GPa and stabilizes to a fcc structure at 38 GPa. The predicted properties of the $C2/m$ structure agree well with experimental observation. At 200 GPa, the fcc structure transforms to a hcp structure. At 214 GPa, a transformation analogous to a Burgers deformation becomes more favored in the hcp form and this results in a stable $Cmcm$ structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207