MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067787590 · doi:10.1177/135676670200800305

Understanding the domestic market using cluster analysis: A case study of the marketing efforts of Travel Alberta

2002· article· en· W2067787590 on OpenAlex
Simon Hudson, Brent W. Ritchie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Of Vacation Marketing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismMarketingCluster (spacecraft)Market segmentationOrder (exchange)Linear discriminant analysisAdvertisingBusinessSegmentationGeographyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Domestic tourism is one of the most neglected and under-researched categories in tourism analysis. This paper reports on a consumer behaviour study by Travel Alberta, which used cluster analysis to segment domestic tourists based on their decision-making behaviour. Discriminant analysis showed that a five-cluster solution correctly classified 93.1 per cent of respondents into the right cluster, and that a statistically significant difference existed between the clusters. The key characteristics making them uniquely different as a group are discussed. The paper then shows how segmentation research can be used to develop a successful promotional campaign by describing the ‘Travel Alberta Made To Order’ campaign launched as a result of this behavioural study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it