Estrogen Selectively Up-Regulates the Phospholipid Hydroperoxide Glutathione Peroxidase in the Oviducts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The oviduct plays a crucial role in mammalian reproduction by providing an optimal environment for the final maturation and transport of gametes, fertilization, and early embryonic development. It is now recognized that these reproductive events in vitro can be either negatively or positively affected by reactive oxygen species such as hydrogen peroxide and lipid hydroperoxides. In the current study, we analyzed the expression of the phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (PHGPx or GPx-4), a selenoenzyme that directly reduces membrane-bound lipid hydroperoxides in the bovine oviduct. Using in situ hybridization, we demonstrated that GPx-4 expression is almost restricted to the oviductal luminal epithelium in contrast to GPx-1, which is widely distributed, and GPx-2 and -3, which are mainly detected in the epithelial cells and lamina propria. Interestingly, real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that GPx-4 expression was highest during the follicular and postovulatory phases. In addition, GPx-4 expression was highest in the isthmus proximal to the dominant follicle during the follicular stage and remained high during the postovulatory period. This increased in expression of GPx-4 corresponded to increased GPx-4 enzymatic activity. Based on intrauterine infusion of estradiol, we determined that the increase in expression and activity of GPx-4 is estrogen mediated. This work clearly demonstrates that GPx-4 gene expression is influenced by the proximity of the dominant follicle in the oviduct in vivo. We propose that GPx-4 has an important role in the physiological control of peroxide tone in the bordering cells of the oviductal lumen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".