A novel laser device for all optical wavelength conversion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A widely tunable, narrow-linewidth, simultaneous triple-wavelength oscillation erbium-doped fiber ring laser (EDFRL) has been developed. The EDFRL can produce double-wavelength oscillations with the same linear-polarization output, as well as another widely tunable wavelength oscillation with orthogonal linear-polarization from 1522.2 nm to 1595.9 nm. The long-term stability of the triple-wavelength output was observed with a high signal-to-noise ratio of larger than 40 dB. By using this EDFRL in combination with a 1550-nm semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA), an ultrabroad tunable wavelength converter is demonstrated with uniform efficiency and equalized optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) over a 9.1 THz tuning range through four-wave mixing (FWM) in a SOA. This result is a significant improvement of both the conversion efficiency and the SNR as compared with the conventional FWM-based wavelength converters. We have also investigated the effect of both input power and wavelength of pump P2 on conversion efficiency and OSNR of the wavelength-converted signals
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".