MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067841424 · doi:10.1002/gas.21629

Natural gas production—international/cross‐border: Rest of world learning from US shale gas experience

2012· article· en· W2067841424 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan L. Sakmar

Bibliographic record

VenueNatural Gas & Electricity · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRest (music)Shale gasNatural gasCoalOil shaleFossil fuelInternational tradePetroleumProduction (economics)EconomyNatural resource economicsBusinessEconomicsGeographyEngineeringWaste managementGeologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Canada has significant petroleum, natural gas, and coal reserves and is one of only three member‐states of the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD) that is a net energy exporter. 1 Canada is the largest source of US energy imports, and nearly all of Canada's oil and gas exports go to the United States. Recognizing the importance of energy trade, both the United States and Canada, along with Mexico, participate in the North American Energy Working Group, which seeks to improve energy integration and cooperation between the countries in the region. 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatural Gas & ElectricitySame topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207