MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The concept of health and health promotion

2007· editorial· en· W2067855878 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Margaretha Strandmark

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · 2007
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, psychology, and well-being
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth promotionHealth policySocial determinants of healthHealth belief modelHealth equityInternational healthHealth educationMental healthHealth carePsychologyMedicineSociologyPolitical scienceLawPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An individual perceives health based on her or his experiences of ill health. This means that a person who has experienced ill health may appreciate health more than a person who has never experienced ill health. A person, who has not experienced ill health takes health for granted and does not reflect on health according to the Swedish proverb ‘Health keeps silent’. This assertion depends on the fact that health looses its meaning if the concept is only defined as something pleasurable without contradiction (1). The concept of health has developed over time becoming more and more directed towards the quality of life and an individual perspective of health. As early as in 1947 the World Health Organisation (2) described health as a complete state of physical, mental and social wellbeing and not only as the absence of disease. The ‘health for all by the year 2000’ declaration (3: 23) states that health ‘ensures equity in health, adds life to years, adds health to life and adds years to life’. The individual perspective emphasises in the Ottawa Charter (4), which assumes health as a resource for everyday life, emphasising social and personal resources, as well as physical capacities. Lastly, ‘Health 21’ (5) states clearly, that health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being. It affirms the dignity and worth of every person, equal rights, equal duties and shared responsibility for the health of all. In the approach that health is a resource Pörn (6) suggested an equilibrium theory in which the nature of health is an agreement between ability and planning. He saw the human being as an active subject, where the relationship with the environment and with oneself determines one's actions. Good health implies that the individual has the repertory necessary to meet her or his overall adaptation demands. Nordenfelt (7) means that the individual must have the ability as well as the opportunity to take action and judge their own ability in a realistic way. Another approach to health is to view health as having an existential dimension due to experiences of meaning in life (8, 9). The human being is a whole, made up of body, mind and spirit, which is the ontological basis of health. The whole of health means to be physically healthy and mentally sound, enabling the individual to act in a way that promotes health. Individual should also believe in their own or others’ ability and have expectations for the future. A synthesis of 35 phenomenological studies (10) showed that the meaning of health is vitality, harmony and balance, experience of wholeness, fulfilment, sense of control and change. In that way health is closely related to well-being, which is identified as the positive aspects of being in the world and grounded in lived experiences (11). Well-being can be seen as happiness, positive stress, intellectual stimulation and tranquillity. Happiness results when the individual has the ability to realize desired projects and therefore experiences satisfaction with herself or himself. When positive stress appears, the individual finds challenges and tries to meet them. Education and environment, where new learning is possible, provide intellectual stimulation. A relaxed attitude and ability to deal with stress lead to tranquillity (12). The individual's experience of health varies from one situation to another. Eriksson (8) connects the subjective experiences of health in a more holistic view. Health can be experienced when the individual enjoys a sense of well-being but has objective signs of ill health, whereas real health is when the individual experiences well-being and has no objective signs of ill health. In that view there are no clear limits between the concept of health and ill health. The understanding of the concept of health constitutes a basis for health promotion. Great Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand have been at the forefront in the development of a health promotion perspective. However, there are still differing opinions about its content. The first reason for this is that health promotion is understood as an overall concept that includes everything that may improve the health of society, namely curative, preventive and health promotion contributions. Secondly, according to Antonovsky (13, 14), health promotion is a more absolute concept, which encompasses resisting power, salutogenic factors and resources of actions that are necessary for movement towards the healthy pole, in contrast to the pathogenic pole of the continuum. From the statement of health promotion health on equal conditions care is according to the patient's needs and prerequisites as well as the caregivers’ possibilities, competence and abilities. In this context, knowledge of the concept of empowerment may be beneficial for patients and caregivers. Empowerment includes the individual's power to manage the situation and her or his ability to obtain the qualifications necessary to gain this power. Empowerment consists of collective and individual components, where the individual component has been described as psychological and the collective as community empowerment (15, 16). In summary, empowerment is a supportive process, in which individuals or groups are enabled to change their situation for the better. The process provides individuals with skills, resources, opportunities and authority. It is characterized by an interaction between individuals who respect both themselves and other human beings due to a positive conviction of their own worth and also mutual determination (17). This way of thinking could form another useful strategies for promoting health of patients, citizens and caregivers. A human being's previous experiences influence the perception of present time, which also has an impact on the future. Healthy and unhealthy processes continue for a whole lifetime (18). For instance, an unhealthy lifestyle can take 20 years to affect bodily functions. Due to the fact that health promoting and preventive actions often do not produce immediate results, long-range planning is necessary. In health care, the caregivers mostly concentrate on what happens during the visit to the hospital. However, considering the patient's history and planning for the future may further improve her or his health. Understanding that health is a subjective experience, which varies from situation to situation, enables healthcare professionals to manage difficult care situations by enhancing health of the patient and giving them the opportunity to be empowered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of Caring SciencesSame topicHealth, psychology, and well-beingFrench-language works237,207