Dans l'œil du Sphinx : Claude Morin et les relations internationales du Québec.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans l'œil du Sphinx : Claude Morin et les relations internationales du Québec., Jean Décary, Montréal : vlb éditeur, Collection “ Études québécoises ”, 2005. 241p. L'année 2005 est celle des quarante ans de la fameuse déclaration de Paul Gérin-Lajoie devant le corps consulaire de Montréal et elle aura été marquée par un retour à l'avant-scène des questions liées au rôle international du Québec. Le sujet a défrayé la manchette des chroniqueurs politiques au momentoù Québec et Ottawa cherchaient toujours à définir un modus operandi acceptable de part et d'autre; un colloque d'importance a été organisé au printemps 2005 et deux ouvrages en seront issus; enfin, la même maison d'édition qui nous livre aujourd'hui une analyse de la contribution de Claude Morin à l'établissement des relations internationales du Québec, nous avait fourni un essai sur la carrière d'un autre acteur d'importance dans le domaine, André Patry. Le sujet est donc d'actualité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".