Species review of the genus Gnypeta Thomson from Canada, Alaska and Greenland (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae): systematics, bionomics and distribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A review of the rove beetle species of the genus Gnypeta Thomson from Canada, Alaska and Greenland is presented. Eighteen species are reported from Canada of which 7 are described as new to science, 3 species described from the Palaearctic region are reported in North America for the first time: G. brincki Palm, G. carbonaria (Mannerheim), G. sellmani Brundin; 5 species, G. atrolucens Casey, G. crebrepunctata (Casey), G. groenlandica Lohse, G. nigrella (LeConte), G. uteana (Casey), represent new distribution records for Canada, and one, G. caerulea (C.R. Sahlberg), represents new province and territory records. New species are: G. ashei Klimaszewski, sp. nov.; G. dentata Klimaszewski, sp. nov.; G. lohsei Klimaszewski sp. nov.; G. minuta Klimaszewski & Webster, sp. nov., G. canadensis Klimaszewski, sp. nov., and G. saccharina Klimaszewski & Webster, sp. nov. The lectotypes are here designated for the following species from the syntype series: Gnypeta atrolucens Casey, G. baltifera (LeConte), G. bockiana Casey, G. brevicollis Casey, G. boulderensis Casey, G. brunnescens Casey, G. crebrepunctata (Casey), G. helenae Casey, G. manitobae Casey, G. nigrella (LeConte), G. oblata Casey, G. punctatula Casey, G. uteana (Casey), and G. wickhami Casey. The following new synonyms are established (first name being valid): G. uteana Casey (= G. boulderensis Casey, = G. punctatula Casey); G. crebrepunctata Casey (=G. oblata Casey), and G. laticollis Casey (=G. wickhami Casey). The species are classified into five new species groups reflecting their presumed relationships. All treated species are illustrated, and distribution maps are provided. New data on collection, habitat, and distribution are presented. A key to the identification of Canadian and Alaskan species is provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".