MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067882830 · doi:10.1109/isbi.2014.6867898

Bifurcation detection in 3D vascular images using novel features and random forest

2014· article· en· W2067882830 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTortuosityBifurcationVisualizationRandom forestTree (set theory)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionImage (mathematics)Arterial treePattern recognition (psychology)GeologyMathematicsPhysicsMedicineCardiologyNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bifurcation detection is important in medical image analysis for mainly two reasons: 1) plaques are easy to accumulate at artery bifurcations, which leads to atherosclerosis and strokes; 2) for quantification (e.g. branch length, thickness, tortuosity), visualization, and blood flow simulation, it's necessary to extract all the branches and their connectivity in a vessel tree, which makes bifurcation localization crucial. In this paper, several novel features are designed for classifying bifurcations in 3D vascular images using random forest. Encouraging results with both synthetic and real datasets are obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207