MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067933400 · doi:10.1155/asp/2006/32476

Advanced Signal Processing for Digital Subscriber Lines

2006· article· en· W2067933400 on OpenAlexaff
Raphael Cendrillon, Iain B. Collings, Tomas Nordström, Frank Sjöberg, M.K. Tsatsanis, Wei Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital subscriber lineComputer scienceTelecommunicationsCable modemBroadbandTelephone lineSignal processingComputer networkElectronic engineeringTelephonyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent deployment of digital subscriber line (DSL) technology around the world is rapidly making broadband access for the mass consumer market a reality. The ever-growing customer demand for higher data rates has been fueled by the popularity of applications like peer-to-peer (P2P) filesharing networks and video-streaming and high-definition television (HDTV). DSL technology allows telephone operators to getmaximum leverage out of their existing infrastructure by delivering broadband access over existing twisted-pair telephone lines. At the heart of DSL lies a plethora of signal processing techniques which enable such high-speed transmission to be achieved over a medium originally designed with only voice-band transmission in mind. These advanced signal processing techniques address many challenges that exist in DSL networks today, such as the near-end and far-end crosstalk (NEXT/FEXT), impulse noise, peak-toaverage-power ratio (PAR), intersymbol and intercarrier interference (ISI/ICI), radio-frequency interference (RFI), and so forth. The goal of this special issue is to discuss the state-of-the-art and recent advances in signal processing techniques for DSL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal ProcessingSame topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207